August 2022 Traffic & Revenue Report

Reporting traffic and revenue for August on our four monitored sites

The past few weeks were pretty strange in the web publishing industry.

A couple of events messed up reporting across all sites, making me hold off on this monthly installment.

Here’s an overview of what happened.

Inflated stats in Google Analytics

Sometime in August, I noticed an increase in traffic across many of our websites. It was a fun morning, as I congratulated myself on the success. Finally, Google was taking note and seeing just how great our content was.

Then I realized that our revenue did not go up as was expected.

Digging in some more, it soon became clear the surge in traffic was coming from two countries: Czechia and Seychelles.

Mediavine and Adthrive were not paying us for the traffic because no ads were being served to those “surfers”.

Our server admin investigated some more. As far as I could understand, this was a strange parasitic script attaching itself to our GA code. Nothing was hitting the server, but Google was still logging pageviews.

Filtering on the server level was pointless. We had no success filtering via Cloudflare either. I know many publishers said they had, but it didn’t work for us.

At some point, that additional “traffic” died out. It lasted longer on some sites, for some unknown reason but by September it was gone.

I have since created a view in Google Analytics that allows me to “filter” out traffic and get more “clean” stats. It isn’t perfect, but it’s something.

This is what it looked like this month for site #2 on my report –

Total traffic is in orange. In blue, you can see the traffic without traffic from Czechia or Seychelles.

We’re still getting some traffic from these countries, but that seems to be genuine surfers. The fake traffic dies out on August 18.

For several days – until I figured out the additional view solution – it was very difficult to tell how much genuine traffic was getting to our sites. Instead of checking GA, I switched to relying on data from the ad networks.

And then this happened.

The data crash on the ad networks

One of the first things I do when I get up in the morning is to check the previous day’s revenue on our Mediavine dashboard. I do that to make sure everything is ok across the board.

That number changes over the days of the week, so I know roughly what to expect every day. I disregard small fluctuations. RPM is never stable anyway.

During the last month of August, I was on edge. Just like many publishers were. Google had announced a major update.

While we typically do very well during updates, the fact that they bothered to say anything felt ominous. We make a point of creating helpful content for users, but hey, it’s an algorithm. Who knows what it thinks is helpful?

So, I was more nervous than usual when checking our stats every morning.

On August 31st, I took a look at the stats and my heart sank. The number was half of what it should have been.

I figured maybe Google’s big algorithm change kicked in and some of our sites crashed.

Fortunately, it didn’t take long to figure out that –

  1. Our traffic looked just fine.
  2. It wasn’t just us. Everyone was reporting a major loss of revenue.

As it turned out, Google’s Ad Exchange was the problem. They failed to update the stats, affecting reports across all display ad networks.

Almost two weeks later, we’re still not seeing accurate numbers for August 31st.

And so, while lecturing us all about how we need to be helpful to users, Google managed to screw up traffic stats as well as revenue stats across the Internet. Good job, Google.

So, there you are. I’ve been waiting to see the final numbers, but I’m beginning to wonder if we’ll ever get them. Might as well go ahead and post this month’s report “as is”.

This month’s report is based on traffic numbers that disregard traffic from Czechia and Seychelles.

And if you’re wondering how our sites faired during the Google update, I’ll add a few words about that at the end of this report.

New here? Here’s A quick recap

My husband and I own a portfolio of more than 20 content sites, monetized mainly with display ads. Our web publishing business makes around $190K in monthly revenue.

I documented our progress in this blog, including detailed monthly reports covering all our sites. In 2022, I switched to reporting traffic and revenue on four new sites.

You can read the initial report here. That post includes more information about our web publishing business and an FAQ. Please check it out first if you have any questions.

Our system in a nutshell

We have a simple system –

  1. Find suitable topics.
  2. Create good content.
  3. Scale by outsourcing, using an effective workflow.

I blogged here about the workflow.

If you want to learn how to find suitable topics and produce the right content, check out the courses on my resources page.

I won’t repeat each site’s story – only the basic stats. Please refer to the initial report to learn more about a site.

Site #1

  • Niche: General (the site does have a unifying theme)
  • The first post was published on April 2, 2021
  • Number of published posts: 221
  • Monetization: Display ads + Amazon

We kept on adding content to this site during August. Not too much – just 1-2 posts per week.

Traffic increased with a record number of more than 73K pageviews. That’s not from the very new content but I wonder if maybe Google was rewarding the activity.

Unfortunately, RPM during August was exceptionally low across the board. August is typically not a high-RPM month but this year the numbers were lower than anticipated.

From everything I’ve been reading, it looks like inflation and fear of an impending recession caused advertisers to lower their expenses on online ads.

That’s why despite an increase of 6% in traffic, the site only had an increase of 3% in revenue. Still, growth is growth, so overall I consider August to have been a positive month for site #1.

Site #2

  • Niche: Home & DIY
  • The first post was published on June 11, 2021
  • Number of published posts: 239
  • Monetization: Amazon & display ads

Site #2 was stable in August – with almost no further growth in traffic. Unfortunately, the lower RPM combined with the lack of growth meant a decrease in revenue (by almost 10%).

Site #3

  • Niche: Pets
  • The first post was published on May 18, 2021
  • Number of published posts: 119
  • Monetization: Amazon
  • Special circumstances: I created the site on an aged domain I’ve had for about 20 years as an in-house experiment. I knew the domain was clean, and all incoming links were on topic.

Site #3 experienced some additional growth in August. Even though we haven’t added content to this website, traffic was up by 3%.

Unfortunately, that was not enough to offset the lower RPM, so revenue was down by almost 10%.

Site #4

  • Niche: Home & DIY
  • The first post was published on August 23, 2021
  • Number of published posts: 214
  • Monetization: Amazon

Site #4 keeps slowly growing but is still at the low end of the traffic spectrum.

Last but not least, our late bloomer.

Site #4 was stuck with little to no growth for many moons. It seems to have kicked in sometime over the spring and has been growing ever since.

In August, traffic was up by more than 50%! Go site #4!

Revenue was up even more dramatically, but that’s because we started monetizing this site in the middle of July.

So, what happened during the Google update?

Google’s Helpful Content Update (HCU) is a strange one!

We’re still unsure about its effect. For several of our sites, the roll-out coincided with seasonal effects and Labor Day fluctuations. Also, Google said this one would take a while to fully roll out, so who knows what exactly is going on?

So far, we seem to be doing ok. Our biggest sites are stable and showing some increase in traffic (probably due to the constant content production).

Smaller sites seem to be stalling and that includes the sites covered in my reports. It may be too early to say if they were hit or not – but it is a distinct possibility.

I guess we’ll have to wait for the dust to settle. Next month’s report should be interesting!

Wrapping up

Thank you for reading so far and I hope you found the report helpful.

Many readers left me positive comments over the last few weeks. Thank you for that!

Let me know how your sites did during August and what your thoughts are about Google’s HCU. Keep the comments coming – and thank you!


  1. Great write-up Anne, as always!

    Are your stats already back to normal? In my analytics I saw a 50% drop that started on August 31st (also on my ad networks report) that’s still not back. I figured (still do) that it’s the latest Google Update doing its thing, but this got me thinking.

    • Hi Jasper,
      The revenue discrepancy still hasn’t been fixed for us, but it’s limited to August 31. Some sites went down in traffic during the first week of September. No sharp drop and it’s a bit of a mixed bag, but I suspect at least for a few of them it’s a Google update thing. Fortunately, the big sites seem stable, so I’m happy.

    • Hi Quinton,
      Good question. I guess it’s a matter of defining “give up”. Since they’re passive at this point, I can just let them do their thing and gradually collect the revenue. Site #3 is in the pets niche, so we won’t be putting more content into that one (I don’t like the niche). Site #4 – I’ll give it one more year and then re-assess. I think it’s a good site but a late bloomer.

  2. Hi Anne,

    After hearing you talk about updating content on the Niche Pursuits podcast, I am wondering, have tried updating posts by optimizing them using tools like Page Optimizer Pro (POP)?
    How did you update the posts?
    Also, I have been noticing that posts of 800 words or so are often enough to rank high. Have you been noticing lower word count posts doing well or are you still going for 1800 words or so?

  3. What are your monthly costs against that 190K of revenue (which is awesome and well done!!)? Also, do you have a blog post showing how you structure your articles?

    • Hi Perry,
      Costs change from month to month but I think overall, about 50% is expenses. I don’t consider all of that as “costs” per se, though the bigger the operation, the more overhead we have. Still, I see a large chunk of the expenses as an investment.

  4. Great stats. Great to see what numbers your niche sites are doing. Thanks for sharing. I’m currently running a blog and this is motivating.

  5. Very helpful data Anne.
    What tool do you use to combine all GA data from the different sites?
    Thanks, and keep up the good work!

    • I just use a Google spreadsheet that connects to GA and grabs the data from there. Don’t ask me how that works though lol – it’s my husband’s creation.

  6. Also noticed the Seychelles and Czechia traffic spike in August on one of my sites.

    Thought the site was finally kicking in, then the 10-14 days of traffic fell off and the site remained unchanged. Still got higher ad revenue out of it, which was strange.

  7. Hi Anne,

    I would like to know your thoughts regarding ad networks. I have a site that would qualify for Mediavine Premier and also Cafe Media (Adthrive).

    I am currently contracted to Ezoic until March next year and I am struggling to find reliable information regarding their competitors.

    I understand that Mediavine will allow me to keep 90% revenue, but Cafe Media insists they can provide a higher RPM. I know that Cafe Media only works with the top publishers so this could be possible, but their is no information online reviewing the network.

    I understand that you are a premier publisher with Mediavine, so I am presuming you are happy with their service.

    Do you know anything about Cafe Media?

    Do you have all your sites on Mediavine?

    • Hi Sam,
      Sorry about the late reply, I got swamped with work here.
      To answer your question, we have sites with Adthrive (Cafe Media) and Mediavine. Both are great to work with. I like Mediavine’s level of attention to Premiere publishers. We have Premium status on Adthrive as well but Mediavine seem to be more proactive (I could be biased from our positive experience in the Mediavine Premiere get-together). I also like the 90% revshare, which Mediavine extended to four of our sites.
      Having said that, Adthrive is a great network too. If I were in your place, I would ask both AT and MV for estimates on how much they think they can get you, based on your Ezoic figures. Sounds like you may have done that already. If so, I would consider trying AT out for three months and then switching to MV to gauge the difference (taking seasonality in the advertising market into account).

      Good luck and kudos on getting to Premiere levels! If you end up with MV, come over and say hi on the next retreat!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *